Opinion: The Burger Effect: Beef and Climate Change

Rehab A. Rayan

Public Health Researcher

The world needs to decrease emissions from agriculture and fossil fuels to halt global warming adequately. Animal-based meals are nourishing and very vital to livings and nutrition in developing nations though they are a similarly incompetent source. Producing beef is growing further dynamic yet forests are still being cut down.

Climate – Friendly Burger

Producing Beef Causes Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Growing beef production demands to expand land. Modern grasslands are usually formed by cutting trees and thereby emitting the housed carbon dioxide in the woods.

As cows and other ruminant animals such as sheep and goats feed on plants and grasses, they release methane (a strong greenhouse gas) in a process called enteric fermentation, and it is where the regurgitates of cows come from., methane is also released from compost. Nitrous oxide (another potent greenhouse gas) is released from the wastes of ruminant animals on grasslands and synthetic fertilizers applied on farmed crops for feeding cattle.

In 2013, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimated that the cumulative emissions per year from animal agriculture were about 14.5% of all man’s emissions, of which beef contributed 41%. The need for beef and other ruminant meats worldwide may grow by 88% from 2010 to 2050, adding immense burden on biodiversity, woods and the climate., Grassland might yet extend approximately 400 million hectares to satisfy this increasing need. The resulting deforestation might raise greenhouse emissions, which can make the aim of limiting temperature rise by 1.5-2 ̊C  unachievable.

Producing beef consumes more resources

Ruminant animals have less reproducing and growing rates than poultry and pigs, therefore for each given meat, they need a larger quantity of pasture. Beef consumes more manufacturing resources than other animal-derived foods which intern consume more resources than plant-derived ones. Beef needs more land and releases more gases for each dietary protein gram than that of traditional plant ones, like beans., most of the globe’s fields could not raise trees or crops as they heavily produce livestock. Hence, the extra beef would intensify the pressure on woodlands.

The opposite opinion!

Many statistics consider emissions from producing beef without these related to alteration in using the land. For instance: in 2017, the Environmental Protection Agency in the U.S. determined that the entire U.S. farming emissions at just 8% of the total U.S. emissions; in 2017, a study published in the National Academy of Sciences proceedings estimated that eliminating all the US agriculture animals could decrease U.S. emissions by 3%; and in 2019, a study in Agricultural Systems estimated emissions from producing beef at just 3% of total U.S. emissions. Meanwhile, a land area dedicated to producing food might store much-added carbon with its natural plants or if left to become a forest. Demanding beef is growing worldwide and consumption by one country could lead to land-use consequences and emissions for another. For instance, a rise in consuming beef in the U.S. could derive deforestation for creating grassland in Latin America and vice versa.

Cutting down beef consumption!

Controlling climate change would not need everybody turning into vegetarian or vegan or to quit consuming meat. In highly consuming nations, If eating bovine beef decreased by approximately 1.5 burgers for each individual weekly or 50 calories daily, this might almost drop the call for further agricultural enlargement and the related deforestation, yet in a world including 10 billion population. Following 1970, the US beef consumption individually has dropped by one-third. The market for plant-derived substitutes is flourishing. For instance, mixed beef-plant substitutes and plant-derived burgers are steadily competing with traditional beef products on essential qualities such as cost and flavour. Persuasive argues for switching to plant-derived diets is that consuming red meat is correlated to raised risks of colorectal cancer, stroke, heart diseases and type 2 diabetes and that foods with greater healthy plant-derived components like legumes and nuts, vegetables and fruits and whole grains are correlated to fewer risks.

In high-income countries such as those in Europe and North America, individuals eat more protein to fulfil the dietary requirements. In the developing nations, provided the expected upcoming increase in meat demand, even if higher-income nations consume less beef, the world meat’s market would probably proceed to expand shortly. By 2050, it is anticipated that the universal consumption of ruminant meat will increase by 32%. Increasing consumption in countries like China will drive added trading opportunities in leading meat-producing nations. However, leading beef businesses are investing in the rapidly evolving protein alternative market. They are marketing for themselves as they operate to diminish emissions from producing beef in their supply chains by advanced production methods.

Sustainable Beef Production

The intensity of emissions out of producing beef differs greatly all over the globe and enhancing the efficiency in producing farm animals could largely minimize the utilized land and emissions for each meat pound. Advancing pasture condition and animal care, growing better animal breeds, which turn produce milk and beef with increased productivity, and adopting enhanced control systems such as grazing rotationally could promote productivity and soil health meanwhile diminishing emissions.

Promoting productivity could reduce demand on tropical jungles by decreasing the demand for grassland. For instance, in Colombia, producing beef combines grasses and trees toward grasslands, hence, the land yields a greater amount of quality pasture. Therefore, farmers could grow more bovine for each acre meantime considerably lessening emissions of methane for each meat pound. In Kenya’s dairy farms, improving the cattle’s conventional food including better quality grass and high protein was found to fasten the growth of cattle, increase milk production and diminish emissions of methane for each milk litre from 8% to 60%. Moreover, feeding additives could considerably decrease the cows’ burping. Better managing fertilizers and applying techniques to limit nitrogen in the waste of animals could additionally diminish farming emissions.

In conclusion, meat consumes more resources than other foods and affects the climate greatly. A future with sustainable food would need a variety of approaches from the farmer to the consumer. Similarly, as the population is increasing worldwide, food companies hold a role in decreasing emissions from meat. Finally, we should work on policies to control climate change in agriculture and energy levels and more; along with using the best obtainable information to reach decisions.


1.    World’s first climate-positive burgers [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.maxburgers.com/Home/about-max/News/Worlds-first-climate-positive-burgers/

2.    Plumer B. Can We Grow More Food on Less Land? We’ll Have To, a New Study Finds. The New York Times [Internet]. 2018 Dec 5 [cited 2019 Sep 21]; Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/05/climate/agriculture-food-global-warming.html

3.    World Economic Forum. Meat: the Future series – Options for the Livestock Sector in Developing and Emerging Economies to 2030 and Beyond [Internet]. World Economic Forum. 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/meat-the-future-series-options-for-the-livestock-sector-in-developing-and-emerging-economies-to-2030-and-beyond/

4.    Unglesbee E. Another Record Year for Meat Production Forecast for 2019 [Internet]. DTN Progressive Farmer. 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/livestock/article/2019/02/25/another-record-year-meat-production

5.    Pendrill F, Persson UM, Godar J, Kastner T, Moran D, Schmidt S, et al. Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob Environ Change. 2019 May 1;56:1–10.

6.    Waite R, Searchinger T, Ranganathan J. 6 Pressing Questions About Beef and Climate Change, Answered [Internet]. World Resources Institute. 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.wri.org/blog/2019/04/6-pressing-questions-about-beef-and-climate-change-answered

7.    Feng S, Grépin KA, Chunara R. Tracking health seeking behavior during an Ebola outbreak via mobile phones and SMS. Npj Digit Med. 2018 Oct 2;1(1):51.

8.    Waite R, Vennard D. Without Changing Diets, Agriculture Alone Could Produce Enough Emissions to Surpass 1.5°C of Global Warming [Internet]. World Resources Institute. 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/10/we-cant-limit-global-warming-15c-without-changing-diets

9.    Wirsenius S. Efficiencies and biomass appropriation of food commodities on global and regional levels. Agric Syst. 2003 Sep 1;77(3):219–55.

10. Ranganathan. Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future [Internet]. World Resources Institute. 2016 [cited 2019 Sep 21]. Available from: https://www.wri.org/publication/shifting-diets

11. US EPA O. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017 [Internet]. US EPA. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks-1990-2017

12. White RR, Hall MB. Reply to Van Meerbeek and Svenning, Emery, and Springmann et al.: Clarifying assumptions and objectives in evaluating effects of food system shifts on human diets. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018 Feb 20;115(8):E1706–8.

13. Rotz CA, Asem-Hiablie S, Place S, Thoma G. Environmental footprints of beef cattle production in the United States. Agric Syst. 2019 Feb 1;169:1–13.

14. Wait R. 2018 Will See High Meat Consumption in the U.S., but the American Diet is Shifting [Internet]. World Resources Institute. 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 12]. Available from: https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/01/2018-will-see-high-meat-consumption-us-american-diet-shifting

15. Singh. Meat Substitutes Market worth $6.4 billion by 2023 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 12]. Available from: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/meat-substitutes.asp

16. Grunwald M. Inside the Race to Build the Burger of the Future [Internet]. POLITICO Magazine. [cited 2019 Sep 21]. Available from: https://politi.co/2U5yjL0

17. Wait R, Vennard D, Pozzi G. This Flavor-Packed Burger Saves As Many Emissions As Taking 2 Million Cars Off the Road [Internet]. World Resources Institute. 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 12]. Available from: https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/02/flavor-packed-burger-saves-many-emissions-taking-2-million-cars-road

18. Devenyns J. Alternative proteins could become a food staple for more US consumers [Internet]. Food Dive. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 12]. Available from: https://www.fooddive.com/news/alternative-proteins-could-become-a-food-staple-for-more-us-consumers/550738/

19. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447–92.

20. Peel. Beef Consumption and Growing Beef Imports in China [Internet]. Drovers. 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: https://www.drovers.com/article/beef-consumption-and-growing-beef-imports-china

21. Piper K. The unlikely partnership that might decide the future of meat [Internet]. Vox. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/3/22/18273892/tyson-vegan-vegetarian-lab-meat-climate-change-animals

22. GREENE D. Fighting Global Warming Requires Changes In How Cows Are Fed [Internet]. NPR.org. [cited 2019 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.npr.org/2019/03/13/702908768/fighting-global-warming-requires-changes-in-how-cows-are-fed

23. Bryan E, Ringler C, Okoba B, Koo J, Herrero M, Silvestri S. Can agriculture support climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas mitigation and rural livelihoods? insights from Kenya. Clim Change. 2013 May 1;118(2):151–65.

24. Hristov AN, Oh J, Giallongo F, Frederick TW, Harper MT, Weeks HL, et al. An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):10663–8.

25. Byrnes RC, Nùñez J, Arenas L, Rao I, Trujillo C, Alvarez C, et al. Biological nitrification inhibition by Brachiaria grasses mitigates soil nitrous oxide emissions from bovine urine patches. Soil Biol Biochem. 2017 Apr 1;107:156–63.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.